Cases 41 - 50 of 54
DASILVA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv51809
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY M DASILVA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
DASILVA v. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY GLOUCESTER COUNTY et al
as 1:2010cv04353
Plaintiff:
DIOGENES R. DASILVA
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY GLOUCESTER COUNTY and HONORABLE JUDGE RICHARD S. HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DASILVA v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv74088
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY M. DASILVA
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DASILVA V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv36484
Plaintiff:
CARLOS DASILVA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
DASILVA V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv34816
Plaintiff:
PEDRO L. DASILVA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
DASILVA V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv36007
Plaintiff:
DEMERVAL DASILVA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Pedro DaSilva v. Sheriff Dept, et al
as 10-1406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEDRO MIQUEL DASILVA
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF DEPT, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and PICC PRISON
DaSILVA v. SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2009cv03588
Plaintiff:
PEDRO MIQUEL P. DaSILVA
Defendant:
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and PRISON P.I.C.C. ON STATE RD.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv03868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
