Cases 41 - 50 of 137
RIVERA v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv02066
Plaintiff:
ANGELICA RIVERA
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, REGINALD GRAHAM, PAUL RICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARDONA v. SAM'S CLUB et al
as 1:2018cv03064
Plaintiff:
MINERVA CARDONA
Defendant:
SAM'S CLUB , SAM'S WEST, INC. , WAL-MART STORES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TEPPER, M.D. v. HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2018cv02905
Plaintiff:
RICHARD TEPPER, M.D.
Defendant:
HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY and JOHN DOE (1-6)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BARNES v. MILLER et al
as 2:2018cv00171
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DANTE BARNES
Defendant:
MILLER, JENKINS, MCGUIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MANZONI v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv01738
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION , TARGET STORES , JOHN DOES 1-3 and others
Plaintiff:
DIANA MANZONI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STERLING v. ADVENTURE AQUARIUM, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00390
Defendant:
ADVENTURE AQUARIUM, LLC , HERSCHEND FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT CORP., INC., SECURITAS SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SHARON STERLING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DYSON v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv05072
Plaintiff:
CURTIS DYSON
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , CHRISTOPHER HULMES and DOE 1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PLOUFFE v. DALLAS et al
as 5:2017cv05150
Plaintiff:
WM. C. PLOUFFE, JR.
Defendant:
THEODORE DALLAS, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JUSTICE EVERYWHERE PRODUCTIONS, LLC v. JOHN DOES 1-6
as 5:2017cv02769
Plaintiff:
JUSTICE EVERYWHERE PRODUCTIONS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-6
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
