Cases 41 - 50 of 97
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv08477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Amaro v. Johnson et al
as 1:2015cv00973
Plaintiff:
Eric Amaro
Defendant:
J.R. Johnson, Robert Coupe, Neal Kirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PENN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. TRANORIS et al
as 3:2015cv07511
Plaintiff:
THE PENN INSURANCEAND ANNUITY COMPANY
Defendant:
CANDICE J. (RIZZO) TRANORIS, A.R. and J.R.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Janice Haagensen v. Michael Wherry, et al
as 14-4301
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANICE HAAGENSEN, Personal Representative of the Estate of Myrtle Shelburne Haagensen
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. WHERRY, Visiting Judge, Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas, in his official and individual capacities, BETTY MAY REED, EDWARD ABERSOLD and others
J.R. MATS, INC. v. INTERNETSHOPSINC.COM
as 2:2014cv03427
Plaintiff:
J.R. MATS, INC.
Defendant:
INTERNETSHOPSINC.COM
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
LOCKHART v. CITY OF PATTERSON et al
as 2:2014cv03297
Plaintiff:
RAMERE LOCKHART
Defendant:
CITY OF PATTERSON, ROBERT MERCADO, DANIEL FINDLAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAAGENSEN v. WHERRY et al
as 2:2014cv00495
Plaintiff:
JANICE S. HAAGENSEN
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. WHERRY, BETTY MAY REED, EDWARD ABERSOLD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
ZAVALA et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05834
Plaintiff:
MANUEL ZAVALA, J.R , SYLVIA CASILLAS , RENE ZAVALA and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KERNEK et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv05766
Plaintiff:
AARON KERNEK and J.R. NIKLOS
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE , NFL PROPERTIES LLC , RIDDELL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
