Cases 41 - 50 of 69
BUCKSHAW v. MUNICIPAL COURT, MARGATE CITY et al
as 1:2019cv12966
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and MUNICIPAL COURT, MARGATE CITY
Petitioner:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BUCKSHAW v. SUPREME COURT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2018cv01156
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, COMMUNITY RELATIONS SERVICE and SUPREME COURT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BUCKSHAW v. RICCIARDI et al
as 2:2018cv01157
Defendant:
GENE RICCIARDI, ALAN F. PELTON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BUCKSHAW v. PITTSBURGH LAW DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2018cv00078
Petitioner:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Respondent:
PITTSBURGH LAW DEPARTMENT, PITTBURGH MUNICIPAL COURT, PARKWAY CENTER MALL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BUCKSHAW v. KANE et al
as 1:2018cv00408
Petitioner:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Respondent:
NEIL KANE, RODNEY CUNNINGHAM, FREDERICK SULLIVAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BUCKSHAW v. POLICE DEPARTMENT ATLANTIC CITY NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2018cv00409
Petitioner:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Respondent:
POLICE DEPARTMENT ATLANTIC CITY NEW JERSEY, MUNICIPAL COURT ATLANTIC AND MARGATE CITIES ATLANTIC COUNTY NEW JERSEY, SAMUEL D. LASHMAN, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BUCKSHAW v. QUAL LYNX CLAIMS ADJUSTERS et al
as 1:2017cv08446
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Defendant:
QUAL LYNX CLAIMS ADJUSTERS, GREYHOUND BUS, ANTHONY SWAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUCKSHAW v. QUAL LYNX CLAIMS ADJUSTERS et al
as 1:2017cv08448
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Defendant:
QUAL LYNX CLAIMS ADJUSTERS, CCMSI CLAIMS ADJUSTERS, GREYHOUND BUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
