Cases 41 - 50 of 157
TISDALE v. GAMBILL et al
as 3:2021cv00747
Defendant:
Kevin J. Ransom, G. Dominic Wellpath, Zachary Moslak and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tisdale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATERMAN v. RIGNET, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01160
Defendant:
KEITH OLSEN, ROYAL ACQUISITION SUB, INC., STEVEN E PICKETT and others
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
BROWN v. RANSOM et al
as 2:2021cv00288
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, PA, SUPERINTENDENT KEVIN J. RANSOM and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
ALFON BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SWEIGART v. VOYAGER TRUCKING CORP. et al
as 5:2021cv00922
Defendant:
KEVIN J PATTEN and VOYAGER TRUCKING CORP.
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS S SWEIGART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TISDALE v. GAMBILL et al
as 2:2021cv00745
Defendant:
KEVIN J. RANSOM, G. DOMINIC WELLPATH, ZACHARY MOSLAK and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER TISDALE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheeler v. Rignet, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00341
Defendant:
Kevin J. O'Hara, James H. Browning, Ditlef De Vibe and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wheeler
LEONDI v. MOSER, WARDEN et al
as 3:2020cv00236
Respondent:
V. MOSER, WARDEN, PA ATTORNEY GENERAL and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CAMBRIA COUNTY
Petitioner:
KEVIN J. LEONDI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COSBY v. RANSOM
as 3:2020cv00205
Petitioner:
FIDEL LAMAR COSBY
Respondent:
SUPT KEVIN J. RANSOM and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CAMBRIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Arunachalam v. Gordon et al
as 1:2020cv01020
Defendant:
Edward L. Tulin, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Facebook, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lakshmi Arunachalam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
In re: Keryx Biopharmaceutical
as 20-2019
Defendant / Appellee:
KERYX BIOPHARMACEUTICALS INC, MICHAEL ROGERS, JODIE MORRISON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABRAHAM KISWANI and JOHN ANDREULA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
