Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
James Evans v. Mercy Suburban Hospital, et al
as 16-3285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES D. EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCY SUBURBAN HOSPITAL, TOWNE MANOR EAST NURSING HOME & REHABILITATION CENTER, MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
PUCKETT v. MILLER et al
as 2:2015cv01019
Plaintiff:
JULIANN PUCKETT
Defendant:
BRIAN MILLER, MICHAEL ZAVADA, BARRY CROFTCHECK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. County of Northumberland et al
as 4:2014cv02126
Plaintiff:
Hope Lewis
Defendant:
County of Northumberland, Roy Johnson, Brian Wheary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STRICKLAND v. NOLEN et al
as 1:2014cv00138
Plaintiff:
JERRY L. STRICKLAND
Defendant:
DAPRINA L. NOLEN, JILLIANE L. KINNANE and TIFFENY (LAST NAME UNKNOWN)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
F. v. PRESSLEY SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF et al
as 5:2014cv00335
Plaintiff:
AKIL ABASI F.
Defendant:
PRESSLEY SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF, PRESSLEY RIDGE, THE PRESSLEY RIDGE SCHOOLS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Gloria Scarnati v. J Johnton, et al
as 13-4154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MISS GLORIA SCARNATI
Defendant - Appellee:
J JOHNTON, Postmaster for Pittsburgh, et al., sued individually, PLEASANT HILLS POST OFFICE, et al, KATHY SHERRED, Former Manager, et al., sued individually and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv05423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
