Cases 41 - 50 of 341
LITTLE v. TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON et al
as 2:2022cv06077
Plaintiff:
TANISHA LITTLE
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON, TRACY BOWERS, MAURICE GATTISON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Finger v. VAALCO Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01201
Plaintiff:
Susan Finger
Defendant:
VAALCO Energy, Inc., Andrew L. Fawthrop, George Maxwell and others
Hinkley et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00832
Plaintiff:
Brian Hinkley, Lori Humble, Alva John and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2022cv00848
Plaintiff:
Morganne Mease, Trenashia Jones, Rayna Moses and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00759
Plaintiff:
Samantha Jones, Angela Kelley, James Kern and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
LOUIS v. OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 5:2022cv00812
Plaintiff:
MAXWELL LOUIS
Defendant:
OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT, SUSAN LLOYD, KEN NAPAVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOUIS v. OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2022cv00812
Plaintiff:
MAXWELL LOUIS
Defendant:
OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT, SUSAN LLOYD, KEN NAPAVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miguel Molina v. Laural Harry, et al
as 21-3374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIGUEL MOLINA
Defendant / Appellee:
LAURAL R. HARRY, DIGBY, SCOTT WHALEN and others
ROBICHAW v. MCGEE et al
as 2:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
RENALDO M. ROBICHAW
Defendant:
SEAN P. MCGEE, MARK S. MURRAY, GARY CHESNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NIEWENHUIS v. KENDALL et al
as 3:2021cv20513
Plaintiff:
LOREEN NIEWENHUIS
Defendant:
KEITH J. KENDALL, JOHN T. MAXWELL, DANIEL BARBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
