Cases 41 - 50 of 82
A et al v. NIELSEN et al
as 2:2018cv09214
Plaintiff:
D A , S K and L M
Defendant:
KIRSTJEN NIELSEN , THOMAS D HOMAN , MATTHEW ALBENCE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
SECOND STORY FARMING, INC. v. MCHENRY et al
as 2:2018cv00387
Plaintiff:
SECOND STORY FARMING, INC.
Defendant:
ARTHUR S. MCHENRY , MAC BUSINESS SERVICES , PRESTIGE CAPITAL, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
NITE IZE, INC. v. KANE & MCHENRY ENTERPRISES, LLC
as 2:2017cv01522
Plaintiff:
NITE IZE, INC.
Defendant:
KANE & MCHENRY ENTERPRISES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv10691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MILLER et al v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2017cv00276
Plaintiff:
DARREN MILLER and DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant:
MARYBETH ANDERSON, MAX GOTTESMAN, MICHAEL CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCHENRY v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC et al
as 3:2017cv08139
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO.
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA M MCHENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KRAIN v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW et al
as 1:2017cv06053
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY L. KRAIN
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW , JAMES MCHENRY , MARYBETH KELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SUTTON v. FERGUSON et al
as 1:2017cv00118
Plaintiff:
JOHN SUTTON
Defendant:
DOUGLAS W. FERGUSON, ROBERT TRAMBLEY, GORDON R. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
MCHENRY v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00533
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ARCHIE MCHENRY
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
