Cases 41 - 50 of 88
WILLIAMS v. VELEZ et al
as 2:2016cv01593
Plaintiff:
PHILBERT WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MOISES J. VELEZ, POLICE OFFICER BADGE #6201 and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MALDONADO v. DIGGS et al
as 2:2015cv05883
Plaintiff:
MOISES MALDONADO
Defendant:
A. DIGGS , CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA , CORIZON HEALTH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. MANIX HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv06176
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Defendant:
MANIX HOLDINGS, LLC, MANUEL FRANCISCO RIVEROLL MEADE, INIGO EUGENIO RIVEROLL MEADE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moises Serrano Moreno v. Attorney General United State
as 15-2594
Petitioner:
MOISES SERRANO MORENO
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03798
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SERRANO v. HOLDER et al
as 3:2014cv00251
Petitioner:
MOISES SERRANO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JOSE SANTANA and MARK A. KIRBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FIRST CHOICE BANK, INC. et al v. ADJODHA et al
as 3:2014cv06183
Petitioner:
FIRST CHOICE BANK, INC. , FIRST CHOICE LOAN SERVICES, INC. and NORMAN KOENIGSBERG
Respondent:
LEON ADJODHA, JONATHAN ALEXANDER, MICHAEL BANASIAK and others
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
SABAT v. TERRY et al
as 5:2014cv04898
Plaintiff:
MOISES O. SABAT
Defendant:
ISMAEL TERRY, DANIELLE HESTER, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EGGER et al v. RUNNELLS SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL OF UNION COUNTY
as 2:2014cv03904
Plaintiff:
BARBARA EGGER , DESMOND OPARA , TION COMFORT-NWAODUH and others
Defendant:
RUNNELLS SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL OF UNION COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
