Cases 41 - 50 of 365
FORREST v. BEDELL et al
as 2:2019cv04204
Defendant:
DR. MOCLOCK, TONER, TRISHA KELLEY and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORREST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. SMITH et al
as 3:2019cv00086
Respondent:
Mr. BARRY SMITH, Mr. JOSH SHAPRIO, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE and others
Petitioner:
KALEEF JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Diaz v. Curcillo et al
as 1:2019cv00718
Plaintiff:
Eric Diaz
Defendant:
Dauphin County Work Release Center, Wendy J.F. Grella, Jeena M. Riaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cynthia Yoder v. District Attorney Montgomery C, et al
as 19-1898
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PROBATION AND PAROLE, MS. TERRY, MS. ANITA SETH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CYNTHIA M. YODER
Stanley Caterbone v. Lancaster County Adult Probati, et al
as 19-1799
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and LANCASTER COUNTY ADULT PROBATION & PAROLE SERVICES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
MINOR v. PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE et al
as 2:2019cv01318
Defendant:
ADULT PROBATION & PAROLE, PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE, ANTHONY GIL and others
Plaintiff:
MARCHESU MINOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YODER v. OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, MONTGOMERY CTY et al
as 2:2019cv01274
Defendant:
MS. TERRY, CHESTER COUNTY PROBATION, PAROLE & PRETRIAL SERVICES, MR. MICHAEL FALIN and others
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA M. YODER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MINOR v. ADULT PROBATION & PAROLE
as 2:2019cv01003
Plaintiff:
MARCHESU MINOR
Defendant:
ADULT PROBATION & PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Mahally et al
as 4:2019cv00419
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole, Lawrence P. Mahally and PA Attorney General
Petitioner:
Kareem Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REED v. SMITH et al
as 3:2019cv00003
Petitioner:
JOHN REED
Respondent:
MR. BARRY SMITH, MR. JOSH SHAPIRO, CHAIRMAN OF THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
