Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 74,157
COPELAND, MD v. TOWNHOUSE AT ST REGIS et al
as 2:2024cv06687
Plaintiff: MARCIA COPELAND, MD
Defendant: TOWNHOUSE AT ST REGIS, EILEEN LUKAS, WALLACK, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WEAVER
as 3:2024cv00118
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DWIGHT J. WEAVER agent of d/b/a D.W. Hardwoods Company
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Austin et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv02324
Plaintiff: Gary Austin and Crystal Austin
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR USE AND BENEFIT OF ELITE ROOFING SUPPLY - CO, LLC et al v. AMERICAN ALTERNATIVE INSURANCE CORPORATION et al
as 3:2024cv06544
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR USE AND BENEFIT OF ELITE ROOFING SUPPLY - CO, LLC doing business as ELITE ROOFING SUPPLY and ELITE ROOFING SUPPLY - CO, LLC doing business as ELITE ROOFING SUPPLY
Defendant: AMERICAN ALTERNATIVE INSURANCE CORPORATION, CONCIERGE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC, VERTEX ROOFING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Lee v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv06559
Plaintiff: Thomas M Lee
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
USA v. Deondre Steave
as 24-1977
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DEONDRE STEAVE
USA v. James Abrams
as 24-1998
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JAMES P. ABRAMS
USA v. Jonathan Baker
as 24-2002
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JONATHAN P. BAKER
USA v. Michael Norwood
as 24-1987
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: MICHAEL NORWOOD
GUNTHER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv06507
Petitioner: JOHN GUNTHER
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?