Cases 51 - 60 of 193
ARAUJO et al v. DOUGLAS et al
as 2:2015cv03800
Plaintiff:
LUCAS ARAUJO and RAMON DEOLIVEIRA
Defendant:
JAMES A DOUGLAS , ROGER HENSON TRUCKING, LLC , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Butts v. Henson et al
as 1:2015cv00969
Plaintiff:
Jody K. Butts
Defendant:
Henson, Smith and Sargent 105
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARAUJO et al v. DOUGLAS et al
as 2:2015cv02776
Plaintiff:
LUCAS ARAUJO and RAMON DEOLIVEIRA
Defendant:
JAMES A DOUGLAS , ROGER HENSON TRUCKING, LLC , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HENSON-JETER v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv06331
Plaintiff:
JANET HENSON-JETER
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders v. DeRose et al
as 1:2014cv00288
Plaintiff:
Cyrus R Sanders
Defendant:
Dominick L. DeRose, Jeffrey T. Haste, Frank J. Laverty, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Henson v. US Foodservice Inc
as 13-4711
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT HENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOODSERVICE INC
HENSON et al v. ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv04564
Plaintiff:
ALICE HENSON
Defendant:
ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. and ZIMMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Meeks et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv03652
Plaintiff:
CHIEF ROBERT MOORE, John Nunan, Patricia Shadoan and others
Defendant:
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C., BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and others
In Re:
PLAVIX PRODUCT LIABILITY AND MARKETING LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Henson v. Prospect Mortgage LLC
as 1:2013cv00719
Plaintiff:
David Henson
Defendant:
Prospect Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
HENSON v. MCNEIL-PPC, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv01931
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE HENSON
Defendant:
MCNEIL-PPC, INC., MCNEIL CONSUMER HEALTHCARE and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
