Cases 51 - 60 of 206
Kauffman et al v. Culbertson Restoration, Ltd.
as 1:2012cv01826
Plaintiff:
Lester W. Kauffman, III , James Boland , Wilson Eshbach and others
Defendant:
Culbertson Restoration, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
J.H. Group, LLC, et al v. Royal Rolling Chairs, LLC, et al
as 12-3476
Plaintiff - Appellant:
J.H. GROUP, LLC, JOHN TAIMANGLO and STEPHANIE TAIMANGLO
Defendant - Appellee:
ROYAL ROLLING CHAIRS, LLC, WILLIAM BOLAND, GARY HILL and others
BOLAND et al v. RAMCO SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 1:2012mc00164
Plaintiff:
JAMES BOLAND and BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND
Defendant:
RAMCO SOLUTIONS, INC.
BOLAND v. AVON GROVE CHARTER SCHOOL et al
as 2:2012cv04040
Plaintiff:
THERESA M. BOLAND
Defendant:
AVON GROVE CHARTER SCHOOL , KEVIN BRADY and SHANNON MCELWAIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Kauffman et al v. Specialty Flooring Systems, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00788
Plaintiff:
Lester W. Kauffman, III and James Boland
Defendant:
Specialty Flooring Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Kauffman et al v. Suburban Tile and Stone, LLC
as 1:2012cv00466
Plaintiff:
Lester W. Kauffman, III , James Boland and Thomas Sipos
Defendant:
Suburban Tile and Stone, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Kauffman et al v. Banner Masonry Corporation
as 1:2012cv00201
Plaintiff:
Lester W. Kauffman, III and James Boland
Defendant:
Banner Masonry Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Kauffman et al v. Alliance Masonry Corp.
as 1:2012cv00085
Plaintiff:
Lester W. Kauffman, III , James Boland and Jack Figured
Defendant:
Alliance Masonry Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BOLAND v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2011cv07888
Plaintiff:
MICHELE BOLAND
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
