Cases 51 - 60 of 89
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 1:2015cv03368
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, BARACK OBAMA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BONNER v. CIA et al
as 1:2015cv01168
Plaintiff:
ANDREW K. BONNER, JR.
Defendant:
CIA, NSA, DEA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BANKS et al v. NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2015cv00654
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS and KENNETH POSNER
Defendant:
NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER DANIEL PANTALEO, HON. JOY FLOWERS CONTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Frederick Banks v. Dictorate, et al
as 14-3474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DICTORATE, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CENTER (CIA), BEHAVIORAL PSYCHOTHERAPY CENTER and others
BANKS v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2014cv04569
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY , US COURT OF APPEALS 3RD CIRCUIT , JIM BRENNAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Banks v. Cessar et al
as 1:2014cv00636
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Robert Cessar, David J. Hicton, S.A. Longford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks v. U.S. District Court for the Western District of PA et al
as 1:2014cv00452
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
U.S. District Court for the Western District of PA, Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Nygaard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Banks v. Director CIA
as 14-1208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTOR CIA
Frederick Banks v. S. O.
as 14-1218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
S. O., M. O., DIRECTOR CIA and others
Debtor - Appellee:
M. O.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
