Cases 51 - 60 of 63
JOHNSON v. COMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2009cv01073
Plaintiff:
DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant:
COMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Scott Johnson v. Frank Gillis, et al
as 09-3113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK GILLIS, ERNIE PREATE and DA BERKS
Johnson v. Duffy
as 3:2009cv00952
Plaintiff:
David Johnson and David Johnson
Defendant:
Timothy Duffy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
In Re: Scott David Johnson, et al
as 09-1536
Not Party - Petitioner:
In re: SCOTT DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant - Respondent:
FRANK GILLIS, ERNIE PREATE and DA BERKS
ROBERSON v. NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ATTORNEY ETHICS et al
as 3:2008cv04463
Plaintiff:
JAMES O. ROBERSON
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ATTORNEY ETHICS, LEE GRONIKOWSKI and DAVID JOHNSON, JR
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DEYARMIN et al v. HAZMAT ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, INC. et al
as 3:2008cv00083
Plaintiff:
MARK DEYARMIN, MARK DEYARMIN, ANGEL DEYARMIN and others
Defendant:
HAZMAT ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, INC. and DAVID JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Johnson v. Beard et al
as 3:2008cv00593
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Franklin J. Tennis, R. McMillan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JOHNSON v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv74880
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JOHNSON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2008cv00930
Plaintiff:
ALYSSA JOHNSON and DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS, INC., ETHICON, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
JOHNSON v. OWENS-ILLINOIS
as 5:2008cv67617
Plaintiff:
DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
