Cases 51 - 60 of 102
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hann v. Borough of Chambersburg et al
as 1:2013cv00247
Plaintiff:
Rene D Hann
Defendant:
Borough of Chambersburg, David Finch, John Leary and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1293
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Schenck et al v. Finch
as 3:2013cv00084
Plaintiff:
Ian Schenck and Kristen Schenck
Defendant:
Ken Finch, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
FINCH v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2012cv05966
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M. FINCH
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
In re: Abraham Nee Ntreh
as 12-3634
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: ABRAHAM NEE NTREH
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
RAYMOND L. FINCH
TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA et al v. CRJ CONTRACTING INC. et al
as 2:2012cv01245
Plaintiff:
TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA , THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY and THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
CRJ CONTRACTING INC. and FINCH LEASING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
In re: Brenneis A. Nesbitt
as 12-1159
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: BRENNEIS ALISTER NESBITT
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
RAYMOND L. FINCH
FINCH v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv57415
Plaintiff:
DANIEL FINCH
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
