Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 2,243
Actavis, Inc. et al v. King Drug Company of Florence, Inc. et al
as 2:2024mc00006
Respondent: KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC., AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORP., Amerisourcebergen Drug Corp. and others
Petitioner: ACTAVIS INC., ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S. INC., PAR PHARMACEUTICAL INC. and others
KING v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MERCER COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00057
Petitioner: BRAD KING
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MERCER COUNTY, MAC MCDUFFIE and WILLIAM MCCLURE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VIRAL DRM, LLC v. KING OF CARS AND TRUCKS, INC.
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff: VIRAL DRM, LLC
Defendant: KING OF CARS AND TRUCKS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
King Jefferson v. City of New Brunswick, et al
as 24-1061
Plaintiff: KING CLIFFORD JEFFERSON
Defendant: CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK and NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH VITAL STATISTIC REGISTRY
King Jefferson v. Bucca
as 24-1038
Plaintiff: KING CLIFFORD JEFFERSON
Defendant: BUCCA
King Jefferson v. Bank of America NA, et al
as 24-1039
Plaintiff: KING CLIFFORD JEFFERSON
Defendant: BANK OF AMERICA NA, GRACE JACKSON and JEFFREY MANNING, Judge
KING v. HATHAWAY et al
as 2:2023cv02161
Plaintiff: JESSE J. KING
Defendant: BRANDON S. HATHAWAY and JB HUNT TRANSPORT INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal-Motor Vehicle
JEFFERSON v. WENGUI et al
as 2:2023cv23363
Plaintiff: KING CLIFFORD JEFFERSON
Defendant: GUO WENGUI, DAMIAN WILLIAMS and MICHAEL J. DRISCOLL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MACEY-KING et al v. TORRID HOLDINGS INC.
as 2:2023cv05070
Plaintiff: PAMELA MACEY-KING and ANDRE KING
Defendant: TORRID HOLDINGS INC. doing business as TORRID STORES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?