Cases 51 - 60 of 74
THOMASSON et al v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2013cv01034
Plaintiff:
HAROLD THOMASSON and CLAIRE THOMASSON
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION , AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, BECHTEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
BECKHAM et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv07213
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO D. BECKHAM , LARRY ATKINS , MICHAEL A. BENNETT and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LUNDY v. PAGANO et al
as 1:2012cv06363
Plaintiff:
KEONE LUNDY
Defendant:
JARED PAGANO, BRYAN BLAIR, CHRISTOPHER LODICO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN v. BURCHFILED et al
as 2:2012cv02430
Plaintiff:
IVAN COHEN
Defendant:
JAMES V. BURCHFIELD, SR. and HENRY LUNDY, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg
as 12-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
MILLIGAN v. LUNDY LAW FIRM
as 2:2012cv00512
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN N. MILLIGAN
Defendant:
LUNDY LAW FIRM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
LAW OFFICE OF MARVIN LUNDY et al v. WHITEHAVEN S.F., LLC
as 2:2010cv04544
Plaintiff:
LAW OFFICE OF MARVIN LUNDY and STEVEN L. CHUNG
Defendant:
WHITEHAVEN S.F., LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LUNDY v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv75955
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. LUNDY
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lundy v. USA
as 3:2010cv00845
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Steven Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
