Cases 51 - 60 of 90
TUTTLE v. WINGARD, et al
as 2:2014cv00164
Plaintiff:
GREGORY TUTTLE and CONNIE TUTTLE
Defendant:
TREVOR WINGARD , DANA PHILLIPS , VIRGINIA COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURKHOLDER et al v. TUTTLE
as 5:2013cv06375
Plaintiff:
DIEDRE D. BURKHOLDER and ROBERT J. BURKHOLDER
Defendant:
CURTIS TUTTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Cibula v. Fox, et al
as 13-3565
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES CIBULA
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES FOX, LLOYD WHITE, MICHAEL GREEN and others
BROTHERS v. CORBETT et al
as 2:2013cv01154
Plaintiff:
WILLIAMS B. BROTHERS, JR.
Defendant:
TOM CORBETT, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Virgil Tuttle
as 13-2553
Petitioner:
In re: VIRGIL TUTTLE
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY WAYNE COUNTY
Johnson v. Holt et al
as 1:2013cv01866
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Johnson
Defendant:
R. Holt, Bracket, Dunbar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Tuttle et al v. Agile Sky Alliance Fund LP et al
as 1:2013cv00802
Plaintiff:
Edgar W. Tuttle , Eric Braun , The Braun Family Trust and others
Defendant:
Agile Sky Alliance Fund LP , Eden Rock Finance Fund LP, Night Watch Partners LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Jones v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2013cv00311
Plaintiff:
Shawn T Jones
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Kimberly Clark, B. Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cibula v. Fox et al
as 1:2012cv02065
Plaintiff:
James Cibula
Defendant:
Charles Fox , Lloyd White , Michael Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
