Cases 51 - 60 of 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1874
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ROLDAN et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2017cv00715
Plaintiff:
ISABEL ROLDAN and BAIRON CASTANO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, TERESEA E MOMBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1788
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ROGERS v. SATAN GOD et al
as 2:2016cv00079
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ROGERS
Defendant:
SATAN GOD, BARAK OBAMA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Justin Credico v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 15-3034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, (UNDER SOVERIGN IMMUNITY ACT-VACCINE WAIVER FOR RABIES), PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03264
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
MUHAMMAD v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 2:2014cv02685
Plaintiff:
ABDUL-ALI MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, JOHN KERRY, KAREN STINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Banks v. S. O.
as 14-1218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
S. O., M. O., DIRECTOR CIA and others
Debtor - Appellee:
M. O.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
