Cases 51 - 60 of 162
Roberts v. Craft Brew Alliance, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00208
Defendant:
David R. Lord, Kevin R. Kelly, Timothy P. Boyle and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Roberts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00179
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sabatini v. Craft Brew Alliance, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00138
Plaintiff:
Eric Sabatini
Defendant:
David R. Lord, Kevin R. Kelly, Jacqueline S. Woodward and others
Jerry Woodward v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 19-3793
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY WOODWARD
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Quintez Talley v. Griesmer, et al
as 19-3796
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. KULL, Lieutenant, JOHN E. WETZEL, WOODWARD, Correction Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Woodward v. City of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2019cv02048
Plaintiff:
Tanel Woodward
Defendant:
Thomas Carter, Adam Sabo and City of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry J. Woodward v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv18844
Plaintiff:
Larry J. Woodward
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mary Griffin v. Department of Human Services, et al
as 19-2751
Defendant:
LISA MARKOWITZ GREEN and VIRGINIA CARLSON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY A. GRIFFIN
Defendant / Appellee:
LAURI WOODWARD, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JEAN DIVITTO and others
TALLEY v. GRIESMER et al
as 2:2019cv01587
Defendant:
C/O DALE SCHOENEBERGER, C/O WOODWARD, SGT. ALIMON and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
