Cases 61 - 70 of 233
BAYMONT FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC. v. MMM HOTEL, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv05884
Defendant:
MUHAMMAD QASIM KHAN, MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR KHAN, MUHAMMAD FAISAL KHAN and others
Plaintiff:
BAYMONT FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04587
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03809
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03849
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SALEEM et al v. JAMES RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2020cv01625
Plaintiff:
ASMA KHAN and SALEEM SAM
Defendant:
BROADSPIRE SERVICES INC. and JAMES RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALVARADO v. KHAN et al
as 2:2020cv02938
Defendant:
ACTIVE USA, LLC and MOHAMMAD NADEEM ULLAH KHAN
Plaintiff:
JUAN F. ALVARADO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fiaz Khan v. Attorney General United States
as 20-1354
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
FIAZ AHMED KHAN
KHAN et al v. JP MORGAN CHASE MORGAN NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2020cv00873
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE MORGAN NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, FINE, SUCH, KAHN & SHEPARD, P.C. and JANE AND JOHN DOE, 1 THRU 20
Plaintiff:
MAHAMED KHAN and AZMA KHAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KHAN et al v. PICCINI LLP et al
as 2:2020cv00200
Defendant:
JANE DOE, EVA K. CAREY, JP MORGAN CHASE MORGAN NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff:
MAHAMED KHAN and AZMA A KHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. LONDON BRIDGE KNIFE ATTACK et al
as 2:2019cv21863
Respondent:
CITY OF LONDON, ORLANDO HARPER, MAYOR, JERSEY CITY, NJ and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
