Cases 61 - 70 of 376
PHINISEE v. GRAHAM-PARKER et al
as 2:2020cv05279
Plaintiff:
RASHEENA PHINISEE
Defendant:
AVANI SHAH, HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE FAMILY PRACTICE AND COUNSELING NETWORK-THE HEALTH ANNEX and others
Petitioner:
KAI PITTMAN, SUSAN ENGLES, LAURA OPPENHEIM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
USA v. Randolph Miller
as 20-2907
Defendant / Appellant:
RANDOLPH MILLER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HARRIS v. QUAY et al
as 2:2020cv04080
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF: MARYLAND and WARDEN QUAY
Petitioner:
RANDOLPH S. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Samuel Randolph, IV v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm, et al
as 20-9003
Defendant / Appellant:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI and SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
RANDOLPH v. BUREAU OF PRISONS - D.H.O.
as 1:2020cv04356
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS - D.H.O.
Petitioner:
JEROME RANDOLPH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MOORE v. WARDEN - USP ALLENWOOD
as 2:2020cv01334
Respondent:
WARDEN - USP ALLENWOOD
Petitioner:
RANDOLPH MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ZENGOTITA v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2020cv01674
Plaintiff:
DAMON ZENGOTITA
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, PETER CASSIDY, JOSE RAMIREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
In re: Randolph Beaudry Subpoena
as 1:2020mc00053
Petitioner:
Randolph Beaudry and Decco U.S. Post Harvest, Inc.
Respondent:
AgroFresh Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
