Cases 61 - 70 of 137
BERNSTEIN v. GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv03172
Plaintiff:
NORMAN W BERNSTEIN
Defendant:
GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
ANDERSON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv02943
Plaintiff:
BRENDA J. ANDERSON , SUSAN CHANDLER , EDNA KEYS-CHAVIS and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR et al
as 4:2017cv00566
Plaintiff:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant:
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR, All Unknown Owners and Barry G. Bernstein
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
MUHAMMAD v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2016cv00233
Plaintiff:
CARLOS MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, TREVOR WINGARD, MARK I. BERNSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERNSTEIN v. KEAVENEY LEGAL GROUP et al
as 2:2016cv05470
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE BERNSTEIN
Defendant:
KEAVENEY LEGAL GROUP , JAMES P. KEAVENEY and JOSHUA THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv04610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BERNSTEIN v. GOLDSMITH et al
as 5:2015cv06099
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER JOSEPH BERNSTEIN
Defendant:
NICHOLAS GOLDSMITH, JUSTIN JULIUS, FRANCIS J. NOONAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DE VITO v. LIQUID HOLDINGS GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv06969
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DE VITO
Defendant:
LIQUID HOLDINGS GROUP, INC., BRIAN M. STORMS, KENNETH D SHIFRIN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
MUHAMMAD v. BERNSTEIN et al
as 2:2015cv04899
Petitioner:
CARLOS MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
MARK I. BERNSTEIN, R. SETH WILLIAMS, EVAN SILVERSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
