Cases 61 - 70 of 110
SMITH v. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv67581
Plaintiff:
CLEVELAND G. SMITH
Defendant:
H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv42399
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS G. SMITH
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SMITH et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67005
Plaintiff:
CHARLES H. SMITH and HELEN G. SMITH
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv41868
Plaintiff:
KENNETH G. SMITH
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SMITH et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66940
Plaintiff:
MARIANNE G. SMITH and CLIFFORD V. SMITH JR.
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 5:2011cv39748
Plaintiff:
CLYDE G. SMITH
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Murakush Caliphate of Amexem I v. State of New Jersey, et al
as 11-2492
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MURAKUSH CALIPHATE OF AMEXEM INC, DBA Murakush Imperial Temple of Amexem
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, SEVERAL UNKNOWN NJ STATE POLICE OFFICERS, BURLINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS and others
SMITH et al v. ATLAS TURNER, INC.
as 2:2011cv65786
Plaintiff:
PAUL G SMITH and BETTY J SMITH
Defendant:
ATLAS TURNER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURAKUSH CALIPHATES OF AMEXEM v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2011cv01317
Plaintiff:
MURAKUSH CALIPHATE OF AMEXEM INC.
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, SEVERAL UNKNOWN NJ STATE POLICE OFFICERS, BURLINGTON COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Morgan et al
as 1:2011cv00129
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Phil Morgan, Mary Moody, Carl C. Danberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
