Cases 61 - 70 of 740
Henry Holmes v. Michael Veith, et al
as 22-3263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL VEITH, WARDEN ORLANDO L. HARPER, JOSE MANUEL CARVALLO, JR. and others
Defendant:
D. CORBETT, ROBERT EVANCHICK, ROBERT FORMAN and others
HOLMES v. ALLERGAN, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv06649
Plaintiff:
LISA HOLMES and JOHN HOLMES
Defendant:
ALLERGAN, INC. and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
In Re:
ALLERGAN BIOCELL TEXTURED BREAST IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOLMES v. VEITH et al
as 2:2022cv01375
Plaintiff:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Defendant:
MICHAEL VEITH, WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, JOSE MANUEL CARVALLO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Troy Holmes v. USAIn re: Troy Holmes v. USA
as 22-3065
Petitioner:
In re: TROY HOLMES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HOLMES v. BERGEN COUNTY et al
as 2:2022cv05680
Plaintiff:
DUANE HOLMES
Defendant:
BERGEN COUNTY, EDWARD KAZMIERCZAK, JOHN DOES (1-10) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. MILLER et al
as 2:2022cv03507
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH THOMPSON
Defendant:
MILLER, HOLMES, REESE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES v. JOHN DOE, et al
as 2:2022cv01342
Plaintiff:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Defendant:
UNKNOWN, PITTSBURG PORT AUTHORITY and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Jenkins v. 1Life Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01152
Plaintiff:
Shannon Jenkins
Defendant:
1Life Healthcare, Inc., Amir Dan Rubin, Paul R. Auvil and others
Acevedo et al v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01094
Plaintiff:
Otilio Acevedo, Ethel Austin, Patricia Beacham and others
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, Pfizer Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
