Cases 61 - 70 of 143
Miller v. Thomas et al
as 3:2014cv00138
Plaintiff:
Derrick Earl Miller
Defendant:
J. E. Thomas, F. Entzel, Michael D. Tafelski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MILLER v. POLLOCK et al
as 3:2013cv07860
Plaintiff:
YEVETTE J. MILLER
Defendant:
JOHN POLLOCK and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv07217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv06178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv02348
Plaintiff:
Betty J. Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thomas Caroll, et al v. William Stettler, III, et al
as 13-3053
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS CAROLL and KIMBERLY BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STETTLER, III, STETTY B84 CONSUTLING, INC, IDN ENTERPRISES CORPORATION and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MELANIA MERCEDES, ANGELIKI DIMANTIS, VIC PATALANO and others
Defendant - Amicus-respondent:
DAVID STETTLER
Michael Bearam v. George Wigen, et al
as 13-2167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BEARAM
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE C. WIGEN, Warden, CUTLER, Dr., J. HUBLER, LPN and others
BEARAM v. WIGEN et al
as 3:2013cv00050
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BEARAM
Defendant:
GEORGE C. WIGEN, DR. CUTLER, J. HUBLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
COUGHLIN et al v. PFIZER, INC.
as 2:2013cv00734
Plaintiff:
BREANNA COUGHLIN and TIMOTHY J. MILLER, SR.
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
