Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Buckshaw et al v. Stark et al
as 1:2012cv01652
Plaintiff:
John J. Buckshaw and J. J. Buckshaw & Associates
Defendant:
Jay Stark and Mark F. Eckhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
BUCKSHAW v. ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 2:2012cv00829
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Defendant:
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buckshaw v. Assistant Attorney General et al
as 1:2012cv00890
Plaintiff:
John J. Buckshaw
Defendant:
Assistant Attorney General and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: John Buckshaw
as 12-2190
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Defendant - Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, CIVIL DIVISION, NATHAN FIRESTONE and EUGENE RICCIARDI, JUDGES PITTSBURGH MUNICIPAL COURT AND MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JUSTICE 05-2-27, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA-SUMMARY OFFENSES
Nominal Respondent:
LISA P LENIHAN
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW ADVERTISING v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2012cv00300
Petitioner:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW ADVERTISING
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, NATHAN FIRESTONE and GENE RICCIARDI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: John Buckshaw
as 12-1551
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Defendant - Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
BUCKSHAW v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2010mc00249
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, ATLANTIC CITY AND PRINCETON BOROUGH LAW DEPARTMENTS, UNIVERSITY OF PRINCETON- OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL and others
BUCKSHAW v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2010mc00246
Plaintiff:
JOHN J BUCKSHAW
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, ATLANTIC CITY MUNICIPAL COURT, PRINCETON BOROUGH and others
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Buckshaw
as 1:2010mc00158
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Defendant:
John J. Buckshaw
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
