Cases 61 - 70 of 508
USA v. Robert Whitfield
as 22-1081
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT LAMAR WHITFIELD, a/k/a Lamar Whitfield a/k/a Goat
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv19844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
DUBOSE v. ALBRIGHT et al
as 1:2021cv20123
Plaintiff:
LAMAR DUBOSE
Defendant:
NANCY ALBRIGHT and JOHN ALBRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffrey Aursby v. David Auxter, et al
as 21-2932
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY LAMAR AURSBY
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DAVID AUXTER, JEFFREY CALABRESE, ERIC FRIES and others
Spoonhour v. Bechtold et al
as 1:2021cv01783
Petitioner:
Sidney Lamar Spoonhour
Respondent:
William Bechtold and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lamar Contractors, LLC v. Auto Depot
as 3:2021cv00071
Plaintiff:
Lamar Contractors, LLC
Defendant:
Auto Depot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAMAR v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv19412
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY LAMAR
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAMAR v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv18794
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC.
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA S. LAMAR
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUTTERFIELD v. TRIPLE CANOPY, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03610
Plaintiff:
DE'SEAN LAMAR BUTTERFIELD
Defendant:
TRIPLE CANOPY, INC. and Constellis Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
RICE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv01134
Petitioner:
LAMAR RICE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
