Cases 61 - 70 of 74
MORRISSEY v. A C & S, INC.
as 2:2010cv84622
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE R. MORRISSEY
Defendant:
A C & S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MORRISSEY v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71986
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL K. MORRISSEY
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORRISSEY et al v. A.C. & S., INC. et al
as 2:2010cv68595
Plaintiff:
JOHN J MORRISSEY and JOAN MORRISSEY
Defendant:
A.C. & S., INC., ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY , CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUBRUZZO v. FIELING/MORRISSEY, et al
as 2:2010cv00558
Defendant:
SUZIE FIELING/MORRISSEY, GERI GILLMAN, RICK LAWSON and others
Plaintiff:
PAMELA L. DUBRUZZO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ushango Owens v. Fox, et al
as 10-2213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
USHANGO OWENS
Defendant - Appellee:
RUTH ANNE MINOR, FOX, KIRKLIN and others
DUBRUZZO v. GILLMAN et al
as 2:2009cv01636
Plaintiff:
PAMELA L. DUBRUZZO
Defendant:
GERI GILLMAN and SUZIE MORRISSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TOELK et al v. MORRISSEY et al
as 2:2009cv05630
Plaintiff:
SCOTT TOELK, RICHARD TOELK and VERONICA TOELK-GARBARINO
Defendant:
PAUL MORRISSEY, ANDY WARHOL FOUNDATION FOR THE VISUAL ARTS, INC., IMAGE ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MORRISSEY et al v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2009cv68745
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. MORRISSEY, JAMES L. MORRISSEY, ROBERTA E. MORRISSEY and others
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01937
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
