Cases 71 - 80 of 111
USA v. Frank Chappell
as 13-1728
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANK CHAPPELL, aka Frank Achuff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
FLADGER v. TRENTON PSYCHIATRIC E2 TREATMENT TEAM ET, AL
as 3:2012cv06419
Plaintiff:
CHAPPELL T. FLADGER
Defendant:
TRENTON PSYCHIATRIC E2 TREATMENT TEAM ET, AL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLADGER v. TRENTON PSYCHIATRIC EAST 2 TREATMENT TEAM et al
as 3:2012cv05982
Plaintiff:
CHAPPELL FLADGER
Defendant:
TRENTON PSYCHIATRIC EAST 2 TREATMENT TEAM, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, TRENTON PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHASE v. GOV. MARTIN J. O'MALLEY et al
as 3:2012cv00180
Petitioner:
WARREN CHASE
Respondent:
GOV. MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, LT. GOV. ANTHONY G. BROWN, SECRETARY STATE, JOSHUA SHATSTERN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COKER-CHAPPELLE v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv03938
Plaintiff:
VANESSA COKER-CHAPPELLE
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
WARREN v. THOMAZ et al
as 2:2011cv07924
Plaintiff:
MAX GREGORY WARREN
Defendant:
CAMERON JIBRIL THOMAZ, ROSTRUM RECORDS, LLC, ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
BALLARD v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv07926
Plaintiff:
GEORGE HENRY BALLARD, III
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, WATER DEPT., REVENUE DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHAPPELL v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv66886
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE W. CHAPPELL
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
