Cases 71 - 80 of 275
Moton v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2018cv01304
Defendant:
Deputy Mazukiewiez, Lieutenant Supervised Cell Extraction Team Unit, Dorine Varner and others
Plaintiff:
Myron Moton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02502
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 142
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01153
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicu:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mummert v. United States of America U.S. Department of Justice
as 1:2018cv00856
Plaintiff:
James Leroy Mummert, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JARAMILLO v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 3:2018cv00058
Petitioner:
JUAN CARLOS JARAMILLO
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. SENTENCING COMMISSION, U.S.DIRECTOR DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Houston v. Department of Justice
as 4:2018cv00387
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lee Houston
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETTIWAY v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv05784
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN PETTIWAY
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. MARSHALLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles v. United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2017cv02250
Plaintiff:
Michael Charles
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CURRENT v. SESSIONS et al
as 2:2017cv05385
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, RONALD B. TURK and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN CURRENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILSON v. OFFICE OF ATTY GENERAL U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 2:2017cv01467
Plaintiff:
ROGER WILSON
Defendant:
OFFICE OF ATTY GENERAL U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and U.S. GOV'T
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
