Cases 71 - 80 of 955
WASHINGTON v. LANE et al
as 1:2022cv07015
Plaintiff:
JAMALL WASHINGTON
Defendant:
C.O. LANE, SGT. YACOB and INMATE NAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Opticon Inc.
as 1:2022cv01627
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Opticon Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Digital Check Corp.
as 1:2022cv01629
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Digital Check Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation
as 1:2022cv01628
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Teal Drones, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01407
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Teal Drones, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
LANE v. LOCAL 827 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO
as 3:2022cv06412
Plaintiff:
KAREN LANE
Defendant:
LOCAL 827 I.B.E.W., AFL-CIO, JOHN DOE 1-5 and JOHN DOE ENTITY 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
LANE v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2022cv01820
Plaintiff:
JUDY LANE and JUDI LANE
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. BTRS Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01508
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
BTRS Holdings Inc., Flint Lane, Robert Farrell and others
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01561
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Lexmark International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
