Cases 71 - 80 of 104
KNOTTS vs. LAWRENCE COUNTY et al
as 2:2012cv01714
Plaintiff:
JACOB G. KNOTTS
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY , ANDREA ANDERSON and JAMES R. JENDRYSIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Dana Wiley
as 12-4158
Petitioner:
In re: DANA W. WILEY
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LAWRENCE COUNTY
Mel Marin v. Tom Leslie, et al
as 12-4114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MEL M. MARIN
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM LESLIE, ARTISIA FOSTER and LAWRENCE COUNTY
William Mangino, II v. Kenneth Cameron, et al
as 12-3902
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM MANGINO, II
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH CAMERON, Superintendent, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LAWRENCE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
WILEY v. U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS INDENTIFIED AS "FORMER U.S. PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON et al
as 2:2012cv01380
Petitioner:
DANA W. WILEY
Respondent:
U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS INDENTIFIED AS "FORMER U.S. PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON, DAVID M. HARDY, MARY B. BUCHANAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Willie Smith v. John Kerestes, et al
as 12-3595
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN KERESTES, Superintendent, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LAWRENCE COUNTY
RALSTON v. LAWRENCE COUNTY
as 2:2012cv00762
Petitioner:
JOHN W. RALSTON, JR.
Respondent:
LAWRENCE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TERRY v. ROSATI et al
as 2:2012cv00705
Plaintiff:
DONALD TERRY
Defendant:
GREG ROSATI , BRIAN LUFFEY , CHARLES LUFFEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Randall Chumley v. Frederick Frank, et al
as 12-2245
Petitioner:
In re: RANDALL HOYT CHUMLEY
Respondent:
FREDERICK FRANK, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LAWRENCE COUNTY
DIAMOND v. LAWRENCE COUNTY AREA VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL AUTHORITY
as 2:2012cv00458
Plaintiff:
MARTHA L. DIAMOND
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY AREA VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
