Cases 71 - 80 of 202
HAYNES v. CLARK et al
as 2:2019cv01407
Petitioner:
NATHAN HAYNES
Respondent:
JOHN SHAPIRO, MICHAEL CLARK and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MERCER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morales v. Clark
as 5:2019cv04971
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and MICHAEL CLARK
Petitioner:
Mathew Stefan Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
YELVERTON v. CLARK et al
as 2:2019cv04796
Defendant:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHAEL CLARK and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Plaintiff:
KEVIN YELVERTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert Mickens v. Michael Clark, et al
as 19-3292
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS MOOK, Maintenance Manager, In Their Individual and Official Capacities, MICHAEL EDWARDS, RN Supervisor, GLORIA GIBBS, RN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT MICKENS
Morales v. Clark
as 4:2019cv01714
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General and Michael Clark
Petitioner:
Mathew Stefan Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ALI v. CLARK et al
as 2:2019cv04339
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL CLARK and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
JAMAL ALI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FARMER-SHAW v. CLARK et al
as 2:2019cv04262
Petitioner:
RASHAWN FARMER-SHAW
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL CLARK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wayne Pettaway v. Michael Clark, et al
as 19-2999
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE PETTAWAY
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. WHITE, under color of law, in her Individual Official Capacity et al and MICHAEL CLARK, under color of law, in his Individual Official Capacity et al
SUTTON v. CLARK
as 1:2019cv00214
Petitioner:
JOHN D. SUTTON
Respondent:
MICHAEL CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SIERRA v. DANERI et al
as 1:2019cv00208
Defendant:
MICHAEL CLARK, JOHN DANERI, JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. ANTONIO SIERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
