Cases 71 - 80 of 382
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. SCHWARTZ et al
as 2:2018cv00903
Plaintiff:
REED JOHNSON
Defendant:
MARK SCHWARTZ, RYAN M. DUNLAP, CHRISTOPHER S. LENTO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
ALFINITO et al v. RUWALDT et al
as 1:2017cv11452
Plaintiff:
RUDOLPH ALFINITO , BRUCE CROUSE and SRCE, INC.
Defendant:
PAUL RUWALDT and DOES 1 TO 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MACVEST GROUP INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2017cv09833
Plaintiff:
MACVEST GROUP INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY , INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
SUTTON v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
as 2:2017cv04373
Plaintiff:
RUDOLPH RUFUS SUTTON, JR.
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carpeah Nyenekor, Sr. v. Carvajal, et al
as 17-3112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARPEAH RUDOLPH NYENEKOR, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CARVAJAL and MICHAEL D. TAFELSKI
ROSSMANN v. MCVEIGH et al
as 2:2017cv02785
Plaintiff:
BRUD RUDOLPH ROSSMANN
Defendant:
BRIAN MCVEIGH, JEFF SESSIONS and JOHN DOE 1, 2, 3, ETC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUDOLPH RESEARCH ANALYTICAL, INC. v. ANTON PAAR OPTOTEC, GMBH
as 3:2017cv04273
Plaintiff:
RUDOLPH RESEARCH ANALYTICAL, INC.
Defendant:
ANTON PAAR OPTOTEC, GMBH and Anton Paar USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
RICE et al v. FIRST ENERGY CORP. et al
as 2:2017cv00489
Plaintiff:
HOLLY RICE , YMA SMITH , RUDOLPH SMITH and others
Defendant:
FIRST ENERGY CORP., NRG ENERGY, INC. and MATT CANESTRALE CONTRACTING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KELLER v. CHIN et al
as 2:2017cv01777
Plaintiff:
LARRY KELLER
Defendant:
RICHARD CHIN, WILLIAM L. ASHTON, IRVING M. EINHORN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
