Cases 71 - 80 of 3,418
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05860
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FEAGIN v. LAWSON et al
as 2:2024cv05835
Plaintiff:
EVETTE CALEN FEAGIN
Defendant:
MR. LAWSON, JEANETTE MATOS and MR. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Thompson v. Leverton et al
as 1:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Thompson
Defendant:
Jamie Leverton, Shenif Visram, Joseph Flinn and others
Warner v. Desouza et al
as 1:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Michael Warner
Defendant:
Francis A. Desouza, Sam A. Samad, Frances Arnold and others
MUHAMMAD v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04724
Petitioner:
RAAJHAUN MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
WARDEN R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
THOMPSON v. HUDAK et al
as 2:2024cv03719
Plaintiff:
CALVIN THOMPSON
Defendant:
JOHN G. HUDAK, JERRY JUDKA and JANE & JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RENNINGER v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2024cv00367
Petitioner:
CHAD AARON RENNINGER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDANT THOMPSON, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR CAMBRIA COUNTY and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR CLARION COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VALEJO v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv04421
Petitioner:
CARLOS VALEJO
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
THOMPSON v. UNION COUNTY DIVISION OF SOCIAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2024cv01471
Plaintiff:
CALVIN THOMPSON
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY DIVISION OF SOCIAL SERVICES, KAMILI WILLIAMS, DEBBIE ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
