Cases 81 - 90 of 1,244
CRUZ v. BRANTLEY
as 2:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
ENRIQUE CRUZ
Defendant:
MALACHI BRANTLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DE LA CRUZ et al v. CROSSCOUNTRY MORTGAGE LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00605
Plaintiff:
HEYDI DE LA CRUZ and VICTOR A. RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
CROSSCOUNTRY MORTGAGE LLC, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC and GINNIE MAE
PINEDA v. CRUZ
as 1:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL ALVAREZ PINEDA
Defendant:
ANDY CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jose Ramos-Cruz, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1104
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL RAMOS-CRUZ, BIANA AMERICA GIRON-BARRERA DE RAMOS, A. C. R.-G. and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
NAVARRO v. NECSOSA LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
JOSE NAVARRO
Defendant:
NECSOSA LLC and DAVID DE LA CRUZ MEDINA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ARTAVIA v. NITTA CASTINGS, INC. et al
as 3:2023cv23426
Plaintiff:
ANA PATRICIA CRUZ and ANA PATRICIA CRUZ ARTAVIA
Defendant:
CASINGS INC NITTA, SYMETRA LIFE INSURANCE, HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE and others
de la Cruz v. Warden of LSCI-Allenwood
as 1:2023cv02147
Petitioner:
Junior Arce de la Cruz
Respondent:
Warden of LSCI-Allenwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CRUZ v. PHILADELPHIA FIGHT COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS
as 2:2023cv04626
Plaintiff:
MARIO CRUZ
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA FIGHT COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
POWERS v. WEBB et al
as 2:2023cv04679
Plaintiff:
RACHEL GENEVIEVE POWERS
Defendant:
JEREMIAH DARNELL WEBB, NOAH SENCER ROBERT BARCLAY, MALAKAI LEVI LYNCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
