Cases 81 - 90 of 21,134
H. BETTI INDUSTRIES, INC. v. OKRA HOLDINGS, INC.
as 2:2024cv03168
Plaintiff:
H. BETTI INDUSTRIES, INC. doing business as BETSON IMPERIAL PARTS & SERVICE
Defendant:
OKRA HOLDINGS, INC. doing business as GOLDFINGER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CARIDE v. DUBOSE
as 1:2024cv04029
Plaintiff:
MARLENE CARIDE
Defendant:
ZUMAR H. DUBOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
DUBOSE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2024cv03768
Petitioner:
ZUMAR H. DUBOSE
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Frederick Banks v. BOP, et al
as 24-1478
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE and ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ADAMS v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
RICKY H. ADAMS and RITA ADAMS
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
MODE GLOBAL, LLC v. HARRIS et al
as 2:2024cv02389
Plaintiff:
MODE GLOBAL, LLC
Defendant:
RYAN H. HARRIS and BRYAN PETERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
