Cases 81 - 90 of 111
CHAPPEL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 5:2011cv45668
Plaintiff:
MARVIN G. CHAPPEL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CHAPPELL
as 2:2011cv66913
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE W. CHAPPELL
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
PORTER HAYDEN COMPANY
Thirdparty_defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHAPPELL et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv37602
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. CHAPPELL and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
USA v. Frank Chappell
as 11-1677
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANK CHAPPELL, a/k/a FRANK ACHUFF
Chappelle v. Varano et al
as 4:2011cv00304
Plaintiff:
Damon Chappelle
Defendant:
David A. Varano , Michelle Kodack , Deborah Herbst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAPPELL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2011cv00484
Plaintiff:
SCHENAVIAR CHAPPELL
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
CHAPPELL v. ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FAC et al
as 1:2010cv06513
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CHAPPELL
Defendant:
ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FAC, CFG HEALTH SYSTEM LLC and JOE BONDISKEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SOTOMAYER v. MEDINA et al
as 1:2010cv05682
Plaintiff:
JULIO SOTOMAYER
Defendant:
EDIBERTO MEDINA, RUBEN B. MORALES, DONATO BASADA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY v. LOGAN et al
as 2:2010cv05254
Plaintiff:
LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY
Defendant:
BRUCE WAYNE LOGAN, SAMUEL LEE LOGAN, JAMES RAYMOND LOGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHAPPEL v. COMMISSIONER JEFFREY MILLER et al
as 2:2010cv01035
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP S. CHAPPEL
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER JEFFREY MILLER, COMMISSIONER FRANK PAWLOWSKI, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
