Cases 81 - 90 of 182
HAHN et al v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME, CORP. et al
as 3:2013cv01491
Plaintiff:
CELIA A. HAHN and JOHN C. DEMPSEY
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME, CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dempsey Cooper v. Bristol Myers Squibb, et al
as 13-1358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMPSEY EUGENE COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB, SANOFI-AVENTIS US LLC, SANOFI-AVENTIS US INC and others
Blythe Township et al v. Larish et al
as 3:2013cv00237
Plaintiff:
Blythe Township and FKV, LLC
Defendant:
James Larish, Michael Petrozino, Tom Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GUY v. DEMPSEY et al
as 2:2012cv06794
Plaintiff:
GREEN GUY
Defendant:
THOMAS DEMPSEY, COMMONWEALTH, COUNTY PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WIECZOREK v. DEMPSEY PARTNERS LLC et al
as 2:2012cv04170
Plaintiff:
ERIC WIECZOREK
Defendant:
DEMPSEY PARTNERS LLC , JOHN DEMPSEY and JILL DALTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jones v. Hashagen, et al
as 12-2220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
HASHAGEN, JOSEPH SEMON, MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI and others
DEMPSEY v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv01750
Plaintiff:
GRACE DEMPSEY
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOYER v. CAMDEN SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 1:2012cv01195
Petitioner:
ANDRE BOYER
Respondent:
CAMDEN SUPERIOR COURT, JUDGE EYNON, MINDY MELLETS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
