Cases 81 - 90 of 944
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
HARRISON-EL v. DOYLESTOWN HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2023cv01203
Plaintiff:
ALI A. HARRISON-EL
Defendant:
DOYLESTOWN HOSPITAL, DOYLESTOWN HOSPITAL NURSE #1, DOYLESTOWN HOSPITAL NURSE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
HARRISON v. HIGHMARK, INC.
as 2:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
KEVIN HARRISON
Defendant:
HIGHMARK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DOE v. HIGHMARK, INC.
as 2:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
HIGHMARK, INC. and HIGHMARK HEALTH
Consolidated Plaintiff:
CAITLYN WARUSZEWSKI, KEVIN HARRISON, WENDY MARSHALL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Ortiz v. SCI Dallas, et al
as 3:2023cv00214
In Re:
ANDY ORTIZ
Defendant:
M. Sopata, A. A. Smith, D. Mull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
RACIOPPI III et al v. UNIVEST BANK AND TRUST CO et al
as 2:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
RICHARD NICHOLAS RACIOPPI III and GLOBAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT LLC
Defendant:
UNIVEST BANK AND TRUST CO and KLEHR HARRISON HARVEY BRANZBURG LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Acy v. Harrison
as 3:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Samantha Acy
Defendant:
Sgt. James Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
