Cases 81 - 90 of 307
RICHARDSON v. HICKS et al
as 3:2019cv14803
Defendant:
MARCUS O. HICKS, WILLIE BONDS, LUZ TORRES and others
Plaintiff:
DARREN E. RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Ebbert et al
as 4:2019cv00997
Defendant:
Lammer, Mr. B. Chappell, Darrin Howard and others
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv02231
Defendant:
SUPT. FERGUSON, SUPT. GILMORE, DEPUTY DIALASANDRO and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAILEY v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2019cv02171
Defendant:
CAPT. BERGER, P/O CARL ROBINSON, KATHLEEN A. MCLAUGHLIN and others
Plaintiff:
ALVIN MAURICE HAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00835
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv02042
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Ellberger et al v. Guichardan et al
as 3:2019cv00726
Defendant:
Teresa D Miller, William J O'Gurek, Susan Byrnes and others
Plaintiff:
Melody Ellberger and Daniel Leeper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOYER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv09484
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
BONNIE MOYER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Landis v. Ebbert, et al
as 1:2019cv00470
Defendant:
J. Roy Ormand, Ian Connors, Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Theodore Landis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sutcliffe et al v. Bernese et al
as 4:2019cv00317
Defendant:
Jeffrey Shaffer, Lonnie Bernese, Waterstreet Enterprises and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Sutcliffe and Lori Sutcliffe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
