Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Bokhari v. FSD Pharma Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03136
Plaintiff:
Raza Bokhari
Defendant:
FSD Pharma Inc., FSD BioSciences Inc., Anthony DURKACZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bokhari v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited et al
as 1:2020cv03743
In Re:
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
Rashida Bokhari
Defendant:
CVS PHARMACY INC., HETERO USA INC., CAMBER PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rocmon Sanders v. Warden Sean Marler, et al
as 19-2153
Defendant / Appellee:
MEDICAL DEPT STAFF, F.D.C.- PHILA., CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., DIRECTOR, F.B.O.P., COMMISSARY DEPT STAFF, F.D.C. - PHILA. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROCMON L. SANDERS
CHAN et al v. GORMALLY et al
as 2:2019cv04989
Defendant:
GARY M. RAUCH, RAZA BOKHARI, JOHN J. GORMALLY and others
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY CHAN, JASMINE HENDERSON and DON DANESH WIJESEKERA
SANDERS v. MARLER et al
as 2:2018cv05477
Defendant:
R. SMITH, SPECIAL INVESTIGATIVE SECTION/SERVICES (S.I.S.) DEPT. AND STAFF, WARDEN SEAN MARLER and others
Plaintiff:
ROCMON L. SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justin Credico v. Bokhari, et al
as 17-2533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Defendant - Appellee:
BOKHARI, FDC Phila MLP, Individual Capacity, BAKER, FDC Phila HHS CMDR, Official Capacity for Declaratory Relief and Injunctive Relief, MURPHY, FDC Phila CMDR, Officially for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and others
CREDICO v. BOKHARI et al
as 2:2016cv03726
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN CREDICO
Defendant:
BOKHARI, BAKER and MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRESS v. DALMASI et al
as 2:2013cv00089
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK CRESS
Defendant:
ONEIDA DALMASI, E. ? BANGOR, ? BOKHARI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
