Cases 1 - 10 of 3,926
ADAMS v. KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2024cv01679
Plaintiff:
SHAMAR ADAMS
Defendant:
KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sergei Kovalev v. Laboratory Corp of America Holdings, et al
as 24-2124
Plaintiff:
SERGEI KOVALEV
Defendant:
LABORATORY CORP OF AMERICA HOLDINGS, LABORATORY CORP OF AMERICA, also known as LABCORP, ADAM H. SCHECHTER and others
SCHWAGER v. BEILEY et al
as 2:2024cv02570
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CHARLES SCHWAGER, ADAM CHARLES and CHASE SCHWAGER
Defendant:
MATTHEW BEILEY and AMER WILLIAM WHITFEAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 ra Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Carmelo Giuffre v. North American Spine LLC, et al
as 24-2073
Plaintiff:
CARMELO JOHN GIUFFRE
Defendant:
NORTH AMERICAN SPINE LLC, DAMON J. NOTO, MD, SPINE & JOINT CENTER and others
Eric Johnson, et al v. David Mazie, et al
as 24-2056
Plaintiff:
ERIC JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID A. MAZIE, ADAM M. SLATER and MAZIE SLATER KATZ & FREEMAN LLC
Tiburcio v. ADAMS
as 5:2024cv02617
Petitioner:
Juan Tiburcio
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MELINDA ADAMS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
WATTS et al v. TATE et al
as 3:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
JOHN WATTS, TRAYVON J. TUMER, ELIJAH GIORDINA and others
Defendant:
ABBIE TATE, SHAUN EDMUNSON, BRENDA MATTHEWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Soria et al v. Briningstool et al
as 1:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
Adam Soria and David Darrigan
Defendant:
Tony Briningstool, Andy McQueen and John Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
