Cases 1 - 10 of 52
N'Jai v. The United State of America: Government et al
as 1:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn B. N'Jai
Defendant:
The United State of America: Government, The Pittsburgh Board of Public Education, Public School Employees Retirement System and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
STARKS v. PATIENT SORTAL INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03233
Plaintiff:
TERRY STARKS
Defendant:
PATIENT SORTAL INC. and KENNY ECK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Nicholas Deyo v. Phillip Eck, et al
as 23-2158
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS FRANCIS DEYO
Defendant:
PHILLIP R. ECK and MANOR TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Deyo v. Eck et al
as 5:2023cv01658
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Francis Deyo
Defendant:
Phillip R. Eck and Manor Township Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Deyo v. Eck et al
as 1:2023cv00689
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Francis Deyo
Defendant:
Phillip R. Eck and Manor Township Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOUDREAU ET AL V. PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC ET AL
as 2:2021cv01385
Plaintiff:
PRINNA BOUDREAU, MARY CAMPBELL, RICARDO CAMPOS and others
Defendant:
PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS R.S. NORTH AMERICA, LLC. and KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOPKINS v. LUMINEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv02618
Defendant:
STEPHEN L ECK, DIJUANA K LEWIS, LUMINEX CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Curtis v. Luminex Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00836
Defendant:
Luminex Corporation, Thomas W. Erickson, Kevin M. McNamara and others
Plaintiff:
Marcey Curtis
Patterson v. Eck
as 1:2021cv00932
Defendant:
Cathy A. Eck
Plaintiff:
Sarah Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
