Cases 1 - 10 of 30,376
ADEWOLE v. SEAMAN et al
as 2:2024cv06311
Plaintiff:
KEHINDE ADEWOLE
Defendant:
ROBERT SEAMAN, ABF FREIGHT SYSTEM INCORPORATED, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DAVIS-EL v. KELLY et al
as 2:2024cv00741
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DAVIS-EL
Defendant:
CHRIS KELLY, BRIAN KAMAUF, KAREN SANTORO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts et al v. Spida USA, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
David Roberts and Dawn Roberts
Defendant:
Spida USA, LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Piper v. Ceresini et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Petitioner:
Robert James Piper
Respondent:
Warden Scott Ceresini, The State of Delaware and The Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THE REINVESTMENT FUND, INC. v. OLLIE RF LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02144
Plaintiff:
THE REINVESTMENT FUND, INC.
Defendant:
OLLIE RF LLC and TRAVIS ROBERT-RITTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Olewiler et al v. Gettysburg College et al
as 1:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
Amanda Olewiler and Teague Olewiler
Defendant:
Gettysburg College, Robert Iuliano and All Board Members
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ATKINS v. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI SOMERSET et al
as 3:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
WILLIAM ROBERT ATKINS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI SOMERSET, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER COUNTY, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sheila Eyajan v. Andrews and Pontius LLC, et al
as 24-1923
Plaintiff:
SHEILA MARIE EYAJAN
Defendant:
ANDREWS AND PONTIUS LLC, CAROLYN E. SMITH, DALE C. SMITH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
