Cases 1 - 10 of 376
RICE v. KARASTON et al
as 2:2024cv01501
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RICE
Defendant:
C/O KARASTON, C/O MANTUCE, C/O ANTWON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY et al v. THISTLE et al
as 2:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY and RICE DRILLING B LLC
Respondent:
HAROLD W THISTLE, JR and GAY E THISTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
RICE v. INMATE ACCOUNT et al
as 2:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RICE
Defendant:
INMATE ACCOUNT, K. DONNELY, N. DELLIPONTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIDSON v. RICE
as 1:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
LUCILLE A. DAVIDSON
Defendant:
PHILIP J. RICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
AUSTIN et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2023cv04132
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
NATALIE AUSTIN, EMANUEL AVERY, BARRY BARTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Brown et al v. Dolbin et al
as 3:2023cv01040
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Brown and A. M. B.
Defendant:
Cyrus Palmer Dolbin, Mark A. Barket, Karen E. Rismiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rice v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00904
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lynn Rice
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
