Cases 1 - 10 of 14
QUINONEZ v. AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC. et al
as 3:2023cv03618
Plaintiff:
BEATRICE QUINONEZ
Defendant:
AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC., JOSEPH A. MCNEAL, JOHN DOES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Adelzo Quinonez-Castaneda v. Attorney General United States of America
as 22-1437
Petitioner:
ADELZO DE JESUS QUINONEZ-CASTANEDA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Juan Gonzalez-Quinonez v. Attorney General United States
as 21-1981
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
JUAN K. GONZALEZ-QUINONEZ
GAMEZ et al v. PCS REVENUE CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2021cv08991
Defendant:
PCS REVENUE CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC.
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO QUINONEZ and CARLOS GAMEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELANSARI v. BARR et al
as 2:2020cv04000
Defendant:
ADAM RAHUBA, RYAN MATICOLLA, AGENT LUKE CHURCH and others
Plaintiff:
AMRO ELANSARI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUINONEZ v. CAMDEN COUNTY PRISON SYSTEM COUNTY FEDERAL COURTS
as 1:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM QUINONEZ
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY PRISON SYSTEM COUNTY FEDERAL COURTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAZARIEGOS v. MONMOUTH COUNTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 3:2012cv05626
Plaintiff:
ESVIN QUINONEZ MAZARIEGOS
Defendant:
MONMOUTH COUNTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
QUINONEZ v. OFFICE DIRECTOR, HUDSON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2011cv07095
Petitioner:
CARLOS E. QUINONEZ
Respondent:
OFFICE DIRECTOR, HUDSON COUNTY JAIL, CHRISTOPHER SHANNAHAN and ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
QUINONEZ v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv57695
Plaintiff:
CARMEN QUINONEZ
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
QUINONEZ et al v. GULF OIL COMPANY
as 2:2011cv38620
Plaintiff:
VIRGILIO C QUINONEZ and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
GULF OIL COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
