Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00976
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
ABDUR-RAHMAN v. CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv05704
Plaintiff: DANIELLE ABDUR-RAHMAN
Defendant: CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC., MCCABE, WEISBERG & CONWAY, P.C. and LSF9 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SKUBINSKI v. RAHMAN et al
as 3:2016cv09483
Plaintiff: EDWARD SKUBINSKI
Defendant: TAALIB UD ABDUR RAHMAN, SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO. OF ARIZONA, LLC , JOHN DOE 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv07804
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
DENBY v. HEARTLAND LOGISTICS, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02814
Plaintiff: THERICE DENBY
Defendant: HEARTLAND LOGISTICS, LLC and RAAFI ABDUR-RAHMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOWLES: BEY v. MOTOR VEHICLE COMMISSION et al
as 2:2010cv02325
Plaintiff: MARY K. BOWLES: BEY, JOHN E. MOORE: BEY, MYANDRA I. BOWLES: BEY and others
Defendant: MOTOR VEHICLE COMMISSION, EAST ORANGE MUNICIPAL COURTS, EAST ORANGE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Kantamanto v. North
as 10-1267
Plaintiff - Appellant: ABDUR RAHMAN KANTAMANTO
Defendant - Appellee: LORENZO NORTH, UNION LEADER
ABDUR-RAHMAN v. SPEARMAN et al
as 1:2009cv02864
Plaintiff: JAMIL ABDUR-RAHMAN
Defendant: DONNEE SPEARMAN, M & M PACKAGING, INC. and JOHN DOE OWNERS & OPERATORS (Plural 1-10)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv03784
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?